Women Rights, Abortion Rights and the Collective Insanity of the Left

On Friday, Donald Trump became the 45th President of the US. He gave a 16 minute speech which he outlined exactly what he plans on doing and it mirrored exactly what he said he was going to do. He immediately signed executive orders aimed at Obamacare and other priorities.

On Saturday, women marched nationally in what they said was a march for all women but in fact was a mix of pent up anger that Trump won and their collective pro-abortion stance. I can say that without fear of being wrong because they excluded right-to-life groups.

The march was underwritten by many far left groups under the umbrella of George Soros--the anti-Semitic left-wing agitator. This was no grass roots effort.

The rage was clearly evident with many saying they marched because of Trumps words caught on tape that were distasteful. I cannot condemn Trump because A) I'm a man who played sports and B) I was once a sailor. There are many words I'd not like to have recorded and played back 20 years later but I digress. I find it amusing that these same women did not march or protest when Bill Clinton was accused of rape and actually did sexually harass a subordinate. In fact Nina Burleigh of Time Magazine said "I'd be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.".

Many women throughout the country marched and the results are about what you'd expect; women dressed as vaginas or wearing vagina hats or going topless or just generally marching. Quite a few men joined showing that they too are inclusive (or were forced to by their militant feminist girlfriends  as well as many kids, some holding signs that they probably shouldn't have been.

They dressed as Muslim women without understanding (or failing to acknowledge) that in Muslim nations, women can be stoned for being raped, they can be honor killed for bringing shame upon ones family (which can mean talking to a man not their father, brother or husband), mutilation of their sexual organs is still common and gays are hung from cranes or thrown off buildings. I guess the irony escaped them. 

The question of the mans role in the creation of a child was not answered and the role of birth control was not given a thought. The idea that abortion used as birth control is repulsive to some people was not even thought of during the proceedings. 

The sheer inanity of the signs was intriguing as I felt as if I were on another planet. Note the second photo below; does that woman have an iota of comprehension what goes on outside our borders or outside Daily Kos and the Huffington Post? 

No, the sole goal was to protect the right to an abortion as far into the pregnancy as possible and many held signs proclaiming "my body does not belong to the government". Funny, these same women cheered when Michelle Obama dictated what can go in our children's bodies or when laws are passed concerning the amount of sugar one can consume. I guess, once again the irony was lost on them. 

I saw many women cheer for the First Amendment while simultaneously those same people would interfere with my Second Amendment rights without a second thought. Again, I guess the irony was lost on them. 

I served our nation so these women could march yet I did not hear word one thanking those who gave their lives for the right they so freely exercised. I guess that was an oversight. 

Anyway, welcome to the past--whenever a Republican is in office, abortion is back on the table at the nightly newscasts. Every move Trump makes will come with a liberal #fakenews outfit wondering exactly what this means for women (and minorities and the LGBT community and children and immigrants). 

Saturday was just the beginning, this will be a long eight years...especially when Trump really starts #winning.

The Stimulus Craters, But Hey, it's Politically Correct

In what will go down in history as an example of what not to do during a recession, the stimulus plan put together by the Obama team has had no impact and in fact may have driven us much deeper into the recession bordering on depression.

His tactic of using fear to further his agenda and his bold predictions are coming back to bite him and despite a compliant media apparattus, people are starting to see right through his bluster and platitudes.

Today we have a couple stories that the media tries to white-wash but can't quite seem to gloss over enough. First from the Weekly Standard:

A "man-cession." That's what some economists are starting to call it. Of the 5.7 million jobs Americans lost between December 2007 and May 2009, nearly 80 percent had been held by men. Mark Perry, an economist at the University of Michigan, characterizes the recession as a "downturn" for women but a "catastrophe" for men.

...The National Organization for Women (NOW), the Feminist Majority, the Institute for Women's Policy Research, and the National Women's Law Center soon joined the battle against the supposedly sexist bailout of men's jobs. At the suggestion of a staffer to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, NOW president Kim Gandy canvassed for a female equivalent of the "testosterone-laden 'shovel-ready' " terminology. ("Apron-ready" was broached but rejected.) Christina Romer, the highly regarded economist President Obama chose to chair his Council of Economic Advisers, would later say of her entrance on the political stage, "The very first email I got . . . was from a women's group saying 'We don't want this stimulus package to just create jobs for burly men.' "

The result as anyone can see is predictable. Construction jobs that would have had an enormous ripple effect were eschewed for more women friendly jobs and have had the effect of stifling job growth. But hey, it was politically expedient so who cares if it doesn't actually help get us out of the economic malaise?

Next we have the Inquirer publishing this piece on the non-effect of the stimulus. Christina Romer--a chief architect of this monstrosity--tries to defend it:

She said she could well imagine many people saying, "OK, we passed the stimulus act [four] months ago; the economy should be better."

Romer is chair of the president's Council of Economic Advisers and coauthor of the stimulus package, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In an interview from the White House, she said the stimulus had had major impact.

"We were an economy in free fall, and that's no longer the case," she said. "If you think where we were in January, that was really frightening."

Is Romer deluded? It's more frightening now then it was in January but the Obama administration is trying to paint a happy face on a pile of shit and Romer is sucking down the Kool-aid in ever larger amounts and will soon be mainlining it into her veins like Layne Staley did heroin.

But it gets better and sums up New Jersey in one statement:

He read that New Jersey would get $17.5 billion in tax relief and spending. Based on a formula, the White House said the stimulus would foster 100,000 jobs in the state.

He kept up with the news last month as ground was broken on the first part of $652 million in road work that New Jersey will get. That's what got him calling government offices.

He was led to the state's stimulus Web site, nj.gov/recovery. He saw no jobs there. But on a Transportation Department site he found names of firms that had won highway contracts.

When he got the owner of one company on the phone, the owner asked him, "Are you in the union?"

"No," he said.

Donahue figured he couldn't catch a break.

"They said they were only hiring union workers."

So we now see that if you are not union or a woman, you are screwed. The funny thing is that it's only non-union companies who are thriving led by the union-busting Wal-Mart. Payback is not so fast in coming for a trade union near you in spite of the sop paid to them by Obama.

I guess if you are a woman, union and a democrat, you're probably having a good recession. The rest of us are pretty much fucked.

I'm feeling so incredibly hopey and changey today, how about you?

Hell Freezes Over: NOW Defends Palin

Hope and change:

The sexualization of girls and women in the media is reaching new lows these days — it is exploitative and has a negative effect on how all women and girls are perceived and how they view themselves. Letterman also joked about what he called Palin’s “slutty flight attendant look” — yet another example of how the media love to focus on a woman politician’s appearance, especially as it relates to her sexual appeal to men. Someone of Letterman’s stature, who appears on what used to be known as “the Tiffany Network” (CBS), should be above wallowing in the juvenile, sexist mud that other comedians and broadcasters seem to prefer.

On that point, it’s important to note that when Chelsea Clinton was 13 years old she was the target of numerous insults based on her appearance. Rush Limbaugh even referred to her as the “White House dog.” NOW hopes that all the conservatives who are fired up about sexism in the media lately will join us in calling out sexism when it is directed at women who aren’t professed conservatives.

This is the first (and probably last time) NOW will stick up for a conservative woman. I guess when it came to joking about a young girl and sex with A-Rod it was finally too much.

Of course that last paragraph was expected because they do have to keep up their liberal street cred you know.

Via Hot Air.

Why Are Liberals So In Hate With Sarah Palin?

I guess with Bush gone, they needed a new channel for their utter hatred. we went swiftly from Bush Derangment Syndrome (BDS) to Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS). They are losing it over the good-looking Alaska governor in ways that if she were a liberal would have the NOW gang marching up their collective streets with pitchforks (and probably flying brooms).

Last night, the once-funny David Letterman went after Palin labeling her look "slutty flight attendant" and saying that it was "awkward" that Alex Rodriguez "knocked up her daughter". Again, nothing from the nags of NOW.

Here's the gist at Conservatives 4 Palin.

We also had "comedian" Chuck Nice calling Sarah Palin "very much like herpes" on the Today show, which elicited zero response from the female host. Video of that below:


The hatred of Palin is so vile that if it were aimed at Sotomayor or Pelosi, we'd see breathless front page stories and non-stop news coverage. With Sarah, not so much.

NOW Actually Notes "Honor Killing"

Generally when the left-wing National Organization for Women (NOW) speaks out on an issue, it's one that will cast Conservatives and/or Republicans in a bad light. Whenever it's a democrat such as Bill Clinton, the myriad media hacks who smeared and degraded Sarah Palin or the various stonings, rapes and hangings of women in Muslim nations, they suddenly clam up.

Not today as I guess the beheading of a woman by her well-known Muslim husband was just too horrifying and close to home. But of course, she tempers it:

The gruesome death of Orchard Park resident Aasiya Zubair Hassan — who was found decapitated — and the arrest of her estranged husband are drawing widespread attention, as speculation roils about the role that the couple’s religion may have played.

...“This was apparently a terroristic version of honor killing, a murder rooted in cultural notions about women’s subordination to men,” said Marcia Pappas, New York State president of the National Organization for Women.

She decried the scant national media attention paid to the story, which broke the same day as the commuter plane crash that killed 50 people in Clarence.

While domestic violence affects all cultures, Muslim women find it harder to break the silence about it because of a stigma, she said.

While many cultures suffer domestic violence and it's generally against women, no other culture I've read about uses ritual beheading as often as the Religion of Peace (TM). I can't think of another culture where a woman was decapitated by her husband because she asked for a divorce but then i could have missed it.

Via LGF.

"Aborted" Baby Born Alive Then Killed

These scumbags put a breathing baby in a plastic bag and let her suffocate in the trash:

Eighteen and pregnant, Sycloria Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.

Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated to dilate her cervix and otherwise get her ready for the procedure.

Only Renelique didn't arrive in time. According to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labor and delivered a live baby girl.

What Williams and the Health Department say happened next has shocked people on both sides of the abortion debate: One of the clinic's owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant's umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.

Police recovered the decomposing remains in a cardboard box a week later after getting anonymous tips.

I've tended to stay out of the abortion debate for the most part because people are entrenched in their views but this is indefensible by the pro-abortion groups like NOW and Planned Parenthood. Speaking of the womens groups, they seem to be eerily silent at the national level on this case considering it was a woman who was treated horribly and a very yound woman who was murdered. To their credit, the local NOW affiliate condemned it because they know full-well that abortion is considered vile by the public but this crosses the line and it could hurt their donations.

Here's what the mother said happened:

Williams' lawsuit offers a cruder account: She says Gonzalez knocked the baby off the recliner chair where she had given birth, onto the floor. The baby's umbilical cord was not clamped, allowing her to bleed out. Gonzalez scooped the baby, placenta and afterbirth into a red plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.

I believe the use of abortion to be abhorrent but it is a federally protected right at this point. However, this case is disgusting beyond words. This is pure and simple infanticide.

Remember, it was Obama who refused to take a stand in this type of situation and who has seemed to change his stand with the changing wind direction.

Liberals will fight to save an evil killer like Mumia Abu Jamal but not the little girl exterminated here.

They sure as hell better charge this guy with murder.

Marking the Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

Anti-abortion folks are taking to the streets in DC protesting the continued legality of abortion in all fifty states. Here's a run-down of what's happening:

-Rep. Mike Pence has introduced a bill to end funding for Big Abortion that is practiced by Planned Parenthood.

-Pro-life advocates take to the same streets Obama supporters did two days ago.

-Abortion and the rights of the father. Short summary, he has none.

-Some idiot slammed his SUV into a Planned Parenthood in Minneapolis.

Courtney at Feministing writes:

On the 36th Anniversary of Roe, there is really no way to articulate all the gratitude that women feel across this nation. It seems most appropriate to try to thank the unseen, the folks who day in, day out, do what must be done to ensure that women are able to make the best choices about their own reproductive health.

She's writing to thank those who make it possible to kill babies (and no, they aren't clumps of tissue) in glowing terms as if she's describing folks who work with the homeless or feed those who can't feed themselves. I generally have no dog in this fight but this is truly disgusting. I wonder if Courtney would ever write something akin to this:

On the 36th 6th Anniversary of Roe the Iraq War, there is really no way to articulate all the gratitude that women (and Men) feel across this nation. It seems most appropriate to try to thank the unseen (soldiers), the folks who day in, day out, do what must be done to ensure that women Americans are able to make the best choices about their own reproductive health live in freedom.

But no, that would never happen because those who areon the front lines fighting for the rights to kill a fetus are more important in the whole scheme of things then those who are on the front lines of freedom and saving untold millions from death or rape by despotic dictators.

I also find it interesting that she used a picture featuring all African-American women when Margaret Sanger--the founder of Planned Parenthood--was an avowed racist who pushed birth control to stop blacks and immigrants from having children.

Don't believe me? Here's Sanger in her own words:

Monday Evening News and Notes

It should be a fairly normal week of posting as opposed to the erratic posting of late.

Here's what's new in the world:

Lucianne.com is getting a makeover. Meanwhile, we have groovy tunes to hear. That site is a bloggers dream for enormous content.

Almost good-looking San Diego woman is auctioning off her virginity for college coin.

Obama throws lefty backers a bone and allows a gay bishop to appear at inauguration.

What's a little misogyny between a reporter and jihadi's?

Jim Rice and Rickey Henderson make it into the Hall of Fame. I imagine Jim's first thought was something akin to "what the f**k makes me a better player fifteen years after they rejected me the first time" while Rickey mused "Rickey can't wait to see Rickey's face in Rickey's place at the Hall of Fame". Two scumbag writers sent in ballots that were blank. I'd take away their voting privileges. BTW, Henderson was a hell of a player.

Awesome headline! Dude sues Hooters for not allowing him to work there. Turning sexism on its head.

Is Obama Admitting His Mistake?

I the wake of the Hillary/Obama primary donnybrook, Obama used his heart instead of his head and never gave Shrillary a look as veep. That was a huge mistake for the first-term Senator and former "community organizer" from Beirut Chicago.

That mistake is now amplified a thousand-fold with the sudden emergence of Palinmania and the subsequent dwindling of Joe Biden in the public eye.

But now The One has called upon the former Most Capable Woman Politician on the Planet to assist him and his campaign and by doing so is admitting what everyone knew two weeks ago, he made a huge mistake by not selecting her for his running mate.

It tells us much that he made a rash decision--especially since it may cause him the election.

Left Hits Bottom, Keeps Digging

The selection of Gov. Sarah Palin has brought out the absolute ugliest rhetoric from Liberals. We're talking accusations and charges that are usually reserved when discussing Justice Clarence Thomas or Condi Rice who fit the mold the left has created of the sellout to their race (in Palin's case, her gender.)

Folks, we're talking into the gutter and still hitting the gas.

Dean Barnett asks “How low will the left go?” I would answer that by saying that we have no clue. I expect to plumb depths heretofore unseen by the blogosphere.

Barnett rightfully takes Sullivan and Colmes to task as I did yesterday, but what of the websites and blogs that are the real hangouts for the left? People click on Sullivans site and read for a minute or two and as far as I can tell, barely anyone reads Colmes' site at all. The sites where we're really seeing the true colors of these socially aware folks are ones like AmericaBlog where they have posted the single lamest post I've ever read. Check out the comments as well to get a view of just how despicable these people when they sense another loss coming their way.

All generally acceptable limits of good taste are out the window now. It used to be that the children of candidates are off the table (think Chelsea Clinton and how she was never even mentioned by the GOP) but not any more. Within a single day of Sarah Palin being announced, the scum of the lefty blogosphere (but I'm redundant) was saying the newborn child of Palin was actually her daughters and whispering tales of worse (note the commenter cites Olbermann and DKos as sources for charges of incest).

So, to answer Barnett's question; we have not even begun to see the level that Liberals will go to in this election. I'm of the mind to print every single vile remark and ensure it gets the widest dissemination possible. There are a great many women who consider themselves feminist's who will read this garbage and will be pissed enough to either not vote or vote McCain.

We are all about to see the troglodytes of the blogosphere exposed to the light and like the cockroaches they are, hopefully stomped into oblivion.

Ms. Magazine Refuses Israel Ads

Ms. magazine, that bastion of "feminist" orthodoxy that was actually irrelevant two decades ago has refused to run an ad showing the three most powerful women in Israel:

The magazine has turned down an AJCongress advertisement that did nothing more controversial than call attention to the fact that women currently occupy three of the most significant positions of power in Israeli public life. The proposed ad (The Ad Ms. Didn’t Want You To See) included a text that merely said, “This is Israel,” under photographs of President of the Supreme Court Dorit Beinish, Vice Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni and Knesset Speaker Dalia Itzik.

“What other conclusion can we reach,” asked Richard Gordon, President of AJCongress, “except that the publishers − and if the publishers are right, a significant number of Ms. Magazine readers − are so hostile to Israel that they do not even want to see an ad that says something positive about Israel?”

I can't seem to come to any other conclusion either. Just another incident that makes one wonder why Jews consistently vote for Democrats when it seems the majority of the anti-Semitism in the US comes from the Left.

Link via the excellent Meryl Yourish.

Hillary and Liberal Chicks

I know, "chick" is passe but it'll probably piss them off as will much of this post.

Anyway, Hillary seems to have a problem keeping the girls with hairy arms and legs liberal woman vote and it could effect her down the line.

It seems that these "liberated" women aren't too hip that Hillary rode old Bubba's coattails to the position of prominence she know holds. The piece doesn't say but I imagine her not bailing on Slick Willie when he embarrassed her in front of the world by not admitting getting hummers from Monica Lewinsky has something to do with it as well.

But that's not the most amusing part of this piece; no, this is:

Jane Fonda perhaps summed up this view best in an interview with the LA Weekly last May, in which she called Clinton "a ventriloquist for the patriarchy with a skirt and a vagina." (It would be such a great quote, except when was the last time Hillary wore a skirt?)(some might question the other part of that Fonda statement as well--ed)

Old Hanoi Jane is showing her age, who the hell uses the word "patriarchy" nowadays? I know I used "chick" but patriarchy? Come on Jane, take your Ritalin, forget that you hitched your own star to the "patriarchy" by sponging off Ted Turner and give up the feminist shtick, it ain't working for you honey.

For a true example of a liberated woman who should be a role model but never will be to the likes of Hanoi Jane and the others who use the word "patriarchy" I again present to you Aayan Hirsi Ali as exhibit A1.