Media Starting to Question Global Warming "Science"

The USA Today has gone off the media reservation and actually dares to look at the veracity of those who push the global warming issue without taking into account the science that says it may not be carbon that's causing it or that it may not be happening at all:

Could the best climate models -- the ones used to predict global warming -- all be wrong?

Maybe so, says a new study published online today in the journal Nature Geoscience. The report found that only about half of the warming that occurred during a natural climate change 55 million years ago can be explained by excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. What caused the remainder of the warming is a mystery.

"In a nutshell, theoretical models cannot explain what we observe in the geological record," says oceanographer Gerald Dickens, study co-author and professor of Earth Science at Rice University in Houston. "There appears to be something fundamentally wrong with the way temperature and carbon are linked in climate models."

This is blasphemy on a grand scale and while Gaia might not strike down author Doyle Rice, he'll be a target for Saint Al Gore who will not let anything that endangers his empire built on lies go unanswered upon.

The global warming swindler's--enabled by a compliant media--have been ramming carbon/warming data down our throats for a decade now and have effectively silenced any opposing viewpoints. The facade is starting to crumble now as people are experiencing colder springs and summers and not seeing rising oceans and environmental catastrophe that was supposed to happen 2-months, 2-years or 2-decades out.

Yes, I know weather is not climate but when it happens over a course of years it becomes a trend.