Read the following and tell me what candidate you think the author is talking about:
...pandered to voters, distorted his opponents' record and continued to show why he's the most malleable — and least credible — major presidential candidate.Hillary? Silky? Kerry in 2004? No, Mitt after winning in Michigan.
Fournier goes on for paragraph after paragraph talking about Romney's supposed "pandering." Funny, I don't recall one single case of Fournier writing a couple of hundred words about Hillary's pandering or her crying or her racial overtones.
And you know Fournier couldn't get through without a mention of Katrina. It's unanimous, we all think Fournier is a hack and this isn't going to change many minds.
Pot to kettle: you're black.
No comments:
Post a Comment