Friday, September 09, 2005

FEMA Failed and So Did Bush

Sphere: Related Content

Glenn Reynolds links to a Rod Dreher take on the management of FEMA and their abilities.

Political cronyism is as old as politics itself. And if it were a benign agency such as Social Security or one of the many DOL non-jobs I'd have no problem.

Bush making a political ally the head of FEMA when he has no qualifications is misguided at best, negligent at worst. It's not as bad as Jim McGreevey appointing Golan Cipel as the Director of Homeland Security in NJ, but it's damn close.

Emergency management is a tricky business. One decision can have far reaching, potentially disastrous effects. I still believe that it was not the federal governments fault, or at least not completely their fault. It was a systemic failure that must be immediately rectified if we want to avoid a replay of the events being played out in Louisiana (events that miraculously seem to be less disastrous than predicted).

Those who read this blog on a normal basis know that I have experience in emergency response. Would I install a friend to lead a response team knowing they have little or no credentials? Hell no. I would look at who had the real experience in that oragnization prior to my being elected and interview the top thirty people. I would ask how they'd react in hypothetical situations and what actions they would take. I would lay a scenario out that has never occurred and probably never will, but I'd gauge their reactions and most importantly, see how they delegate their authority.

By installing the top echelon of management those with no experience was a major screw up. I don't think that Bush reacted too slowly, the military acted flawlessly. His problem was that he relied on people he (or some nameless underling, but ultimately his responsibility) appointed who were grossly unqualified to hold the positions they currently are getting paid for. Hopefully Bush will learn from this, but in my opinion, this is a definite stain on his administration and his management.

Update: The head of FEMA is confirmed by the Senate. Shouldn't a reporter ask Ms. Pelosi or Sen. Kennedy why they allowed him to be confirmed in the first place?

Update 2 (9/11 0930): I've received several e-mails slamming me for speaking out against the president. This is a case where the administration was clearly wrong. I am a huge supporter of Bush and will continue to be. That said, by not questioning our leaders when circumstances warrant will reduce us to the equivalent of Kool-aid drinkers at Atrios' and Kos' sites. That is not simething I could live with.

This is a clear cut case of bad management, one that would have occurred if we were discussing a President Kerry (shudder) response. Bush made a huge mistake by putting an unqualified team of supporters into a position that could have far-reaching repercussions.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nice BLOG site here! We'll tell folks about it. By the way,

Here is an AMAZING website site we ran across.
Upper Back Pain
It contains very helpful info about Upper Back Pain.
Please come by for a visit. You won't regret it!

Anonymous said...

A real enlightening blog. Don't stop now. Don't miss visiting this site about Wedding band This is a great resource for Wedding band

Anonymous said...

Nice post...

Scott @ POV

clint said...

On your question: "The head of FEMA is confirmed by the Senate. Shouldn't a reporter ask Ms. Pelosi or Sen. Kennedy why they allowed him to be confirmed in the first place?"

He was confirmed by the Senate on August 1st, 2002 (when the Democrats controlled the Senate), without objection, in a group with a bunch of other unobjectionable appointments -- so no roll call vote.

Two months earlier, he was approved by the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee (transcript here). Joe Lieberman, the Democratic committee chair concluded with: "Mr. Brown, I thank you very much. I will certainly support your nomination. I will do my best to move it through the Committee as soon as possible so we can have you fully and legally at work in your new position. In the meantime, I thank you very much."

Without defending Brown's recent performance -- the recent suggestion that he was obviously unqualified is novel.

Dave Justus said...

I am still up in the air on whether the federal response was slow or not.

I can't find any objective criteria on how fast, and to what extent, we should expect them to be able to mobilize for something like this.

Obviously, people suffered and it would be nice if we could have done more quicker. Certainly I will accept that mistakes were made, it is an inherently chaotic environment and mistakes will happen. Whether or not they were a result of gross incompence at the Federal level I am still unsure of.

Bottom line, if Brown was unable to handle the job the blame is Bush's and no one elses. He did seem fine last year during the major hurricanes that ravaged Florida though.

tarpon said...

Well Jack Kelly spelled it out, the response to Katrina beat out Andrew and Floyd, hurricanes in kinder gentler times when Clinton was President. FEMA got slammed in both cases for their poor response times.

I posted about it earlier here.