Amazing

Mini Pundit, whom I've had many disagreements, says this:

By the way, the reason we haven't been attacked since 2001 is because, quite frankly, 9/11 was a fluke. Terrorism just isn't a major threat to the U.S.

He points to a piece in Reason that has been debunked numerous times. You may notice that this may well be the new line of the left now that Clinton is the appearing to be the main culprit.

Do you believe that if we are the victims of an attack tomorrow that this guy wouldn't be the first to blame Bush?

How can that statement be made with a straight face? I can only point the poor misguided lad to this post.