At least she does if you read this sorry site:
The notion that Hillary is too "polarizing" to win is straight from the mouths of Roves. Millions and millions of us hated Bush's policies. He was polarizing. It didn't stop him.
Unfortunately for you, a few million more decided that they were just fine with Mr. Bush. In fact, he was the first candidate in years to get better than 50% of the vote. He won by 3%, which in the new millenium is a mandate. Hillary is not just polarizing, she was shady as proven by the Travel Office Scandal, Whitewater and the myriad other under the table things that occurred in the Clinton White House.
Remember: we need 2% more than what Kerry got in 2004. Given the tide turning against Iraq, the attempt to hand Social Security to Wall Street, the bankruptcy bill handout to wealthy credit card companies, and every other Republican policy that is against us and for not just the rich but the filthy rich, we can get that 2%.
Phrases like "the filthy rich" are so passe and simplisme. Americans just don't buy the whole class struggle BS anymore.
This means that 49% of the country can hate Hillary because she's strong, she's a woman, she's ambitious, she's married to a sex addict, or she's "liberal" whatever the fuck that means. But if the other 51% of us notice that she wants us to make a decent living, live good lives the way we choose to do so, and raise happy children, the haters don't get to decide.
By that thinking, I guess that Republicans make a shitty living, live horrible lives led by puppetmaster Karl Rove and have miserable children.
I guess it was Republicans who were out there holding signs that said Kerry = Hitler, huh? Who are the real haters? Here's the comment this bitter woman left at this site yesterday:
brown's defective because she wants six-year-olds to work in factories if it makes rich people an extra buck or two.
rice because she lied to america, thomas because he doesn't think for himself (just mimics scalia).
don't project your own whatever onto us.
I say that's pretty hateful and borderline racist, wouldn't you? By the way, that little black thing on your keyboard that says "Shift", if you hold that button down and hit a letter key, it makes that letter from a small letter to a big letter. Practice for awhile and you just might figure it out.
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Hillary Rules
Sphere: Related Content
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
Coming from someone who doesn't necessarily want Hillary to run, I think the point of the first paragraph was that a great number of people did find Bush polarizing and he achieved success despite that. The point being, maybe Hillary can too.
Also, I would say the comments from the 'bitter woman' (why bitter?) aren't racist and hateful. It isn't racist or hateful to criticize someone who is black, asian, latino or whatever. Its critical, you might not agree, but its not racism.
Not racist you say? Look at the original article. She proved the guys theory by calling Thomas defective.
That is borderline racist. If a successful minority (Rice, Gonzalez, Rogers-Brown) doesn't abide by the liberal rules, they must be "defective".
Oh I'm sorry, I guess I misunderstood. I thought that you meant the comments from the woman were racist, not the original article.
If you follow your logic, anyone who thinks Thomas isn't a good justice is racist? Every liberal believes that if a minority is conservative they are defective? I'm not sure you a really qualified to say that since you aren't a liberal. Anyone who doesn't like what Rice Gonzales and Rogers-Brown stand for is racist? I think that is a pretty broad stroke.
You are proving my point. The commenter said that Thomas was "defective".
Think about that. Did you read the original article?
The original article was a black man's thoughts on what the liberal position is on blacks who think and vote conservatively.
Imagine what you'd be saying about me if I called an African-American "defective".
You can defend this woman who commented all you want, it doesn't change the words she has written.
and you can slander me all you like, scott. i'm not a racist. i think bush and cheney and scalia and priscilla owens brown are "defective," too.
defective was your word, or the guy who wrote the article's word.
keyboards are designed for men, is why i don't destroy my hands reaching for the shift key.
i am bitter that our country is being run by the likes of you. but other than that, life's good.
(thank you katinula.)
Post a Comment