Other Than That It Was Correct

A nice correction in the NY Times:

Because of an editing error, a front-page article on Friday about an American military commander's appraisal of security for elections to be held in Iraq on Jan. 30 misstated the portion of Iraq's population that lives in the four provinces he deemed unsafe for voting. (The error was repeated on Sunday in an Op-Ed column by Maureen Dowd.) The portion is 42.5 percent, not more than half.

Does Maureen Dowd read anything but the Times? She based a portion of her column on an easy to research error. She calls Wolfowitz a walking mistake in the article, perhaps it is you, dear Maureen who is the walking mistake. Does she do any research on any topic? How the hell was it an editing error? The Times is despicable.