Mickey Kaus rips the NY Times for some shady reporting:
But the Times coverage isn't really that bad. It's worse! Soxblog also busts Nagourney and Elder for what appears to be dissembling. They report, in the very first sentence of their piece, that
President Bush's job approval rating has fallen to the lowest level of his presidency, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.
But if you look at the previous poll results listed in the Times web site, you learn that a month ago Bush's approval rating was a point lower and his disapproval rating was a point higher. Bush has actually gained in the past month. It doesn't appear to be, you know, true that his "approval rating has fallen to the lowest level of his presidency." It was worse last month. The same goes for Bush's favorability ratings, which were lower last month (36 favorable/47 unfavorable) than this month (39 favorable/45 unfavorable).
Kaus deciphers the Times coverage of their own poll and the way they reported it beautifully.
Tuesday, June 29, 2004
Sphere: Related Content
Posted by Scott at 10:16 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment